While the Supreme Court ruled on June 15 of 2020 that employers can use race or ethnicity in some sorts of hiring decisions, many marijuana social equity programs are now facing possible termination due to this new ruling. While these important programs have been successful in providing pathways to entrepreneurship for minority groups otherwise left behind, they must be saved from the backlash of this decision. In this article, we will explore how to protect such valuable contributions from being eliminated.
1. Saving Social Equity Programs for Marijuana: A Necessity
The marijuana industry is growing rapidly and it is a fantastic opportunity for countries looking to divest from their reliance on fossil fuels. However, countries must also ensure that they are saving social equity programs that promote people from communities dis-proportionately impacted by the war on drugs, so that they are able to benefit from this new industry. This is especially necessary since communities have, for decades, suffered from the consequences of anti-drug laws that were disproportionately enforced.
- Eradicate Diversity Issue: It is imperative to eradicate the diversity issue that exists across the sector and preventing communities impacted by past policy from accessing the economic advantages that cannabis legalization brings.
- Opportunities for All: Initiatives should be introduced to ensure that all citizens have access to the opportunities that the legalization of cannabis provides. This includes lowering licensing fees and other capital requirements, as well as technical assistance for small businesses.
Saving social equity programs for marijuana is critical for the legalization effort to be meaningful and for the economic and social benefits of the industry to be spread widely across the nation. Without these social equity programs in place, many communities and individuals will be completely shut out from the advantages of the industry, leaving their communities unable to benefit from the economic opportunities the new industry will bring.
2. Examining the Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Ruling
The Supreme Court recently issued a landmark ruling on affirmative action. It was a decisive win for advocates of student diversity in higher education programs.
So, what did the ruling say? The ruling upheld a lower court’s decision that Michigan’s 2006 ban on the use of racial preferences for college admissions was in violation of the Equal Protection Clause. By doing this, the court affirmed the right of universities to consider race in admissions.
- Race Can be a Factor: The ruling stated that universities can use race as one component in holistic assessments, so long as it serves the goal of helping to provide a diverse learning environment.
- Governing Factors: The court put several crucial restrictions on how race can be used, however. The race factor must be necessary and must be employed in a tailored way, and must not result in discrete racial classifications or quotas.
- Judicial Opinion: The court’s opinion provided support for affirmative action programs that seek to provide opportunities for socio-economically disadvantaged students of all races to benefit from higher education.
- Reaction: The ruling has been applauded by many civil rights groups who see it as an important victory in the quest for educational equality and diversity.
3. Crafting a Strategy for Protecting Social Equity Programs
Developing an effective strategy means thoroughly understanding social equity programs in your state and exploring policy and legal boundaries that guard against potential mishandling. Once you have a firm legal and institutional understanding of the program, you can start to craft a comprehensive, proactive strategy for protecting these social programs.
Taking a proactive approach to safeguarding social equity programs requires a few steps:
- Establish defined goals. Have an idea of the scope, purpose, and potential of the social equity program before crafting a strategy. Doing this allows you to set realistic objectives and determine the necessary actions necessary for success.
- Identify potential risks. Analyzing ahead of time any foreseeable risks is essential in proactively safeguarding any social equity programs. Take the time to examine potential security threats, evaluate legal concerns, and analyze potential financial risks.
- Choose tactics to minimize threats. Once you know the scope, goals, and potential risks of the program, you can determine the tactics necessary to achieve those goals and protect the integrity of the program.
From policy review to security upgrades, there are a variety of steps you can take to build a comprehensive strategy for protecting your social equity programs.
4. Time to Safeguard Marijuana Social Equity Programs from Supreme Court Rulings
Addressing Supreme Court Decisions’ Impact on Marijuana Social Equity Programs
The future of marijuana social equity programs rests in the balance as the Supreme Court is poised to make important rulings. Without adequate protection, existing social equity frameworks like licensing opportunities and technical assistance may face serious compromise. While the stakes are high, it’s time to recognize the importance of safeguarding such initiatives.
To get started, lawmakers and constituencies must recognize the wide-reaching implications of each impending Supreme Court decision. A potential outcome could further negatively impact the ability to:
- Secure access to capital
- Obtain approval for operational permits
- Establish effective business models
- Tap resources for workforce training
Further, potential legal impacts may unduly affect the ability of those with prior criminal records in relation to marijuana to obtain the social equity they deserve. Crucial measures such as amnesty, clearance, and expungement must be available to those affected by prior policies and enforced with due diligence. The time is now to ensure that social equity programs remain protected during any and all Supreme Court decisions.
As the marijuana market evolves, it is essential that we continue to be aware of the implications of the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling and actively fight for social equity in the marijuana industry. Only by standing together and advocating for more just policies can we hope to save marijuana social equity programs from the Supreme Court’s ruling and help ensure that everyone is provided with an equal and just opportunity to capitalize on the growing marijuana industry.